«
»

You Need Bilateral Training for the Anabolic Effect? Maybe Not.


Thanks to Coach Charles Poliquin for this review of an as yet unpublished NSCA article. I won’t be surprised if this one never sees the light of day in the journal as it refutes a fundamental arguement against single leg work. Everyone who advocates continuing with double leg strength training always touts the anabolic/ hormonal effects of big weights. Here is at least one study that says that may not be true.

http://www.charlespoliquin.com/Blog/tabid/130/EntryId/923/Tip-268-Get-Stronger-Bigger-Legs-With-Squats-Varied-Training-For-Optimal-Anabolic-Response.aspx

Advertisement

This entry was posted on February 7, 2012 at 3:04 am and is filed under Low Back Pain, StrengthCoach.com Updates, Training, Training Females, Uncategorized, Youth Training with tags , , . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

3 Responses to “You Need Bilateral Training for the Anabolic Effect? Maybe Not.”

  1. » The Gymless Body- Great fitness reads from this week The Gymless Body Says:
    February 11, 2012 at 9:42 am

    […] You Need Bilateral Training For the Anabolic Effect? Maybe Not by Mike Boyle […]

  2. Milton Keynes MMA – Great fitness reads for the week | Milton Keynes MMA Says:
    February 11, 2012 at 9:42 am

    […] You Need Bilateral Training For the Anabolic Effect? Maybe Not by Mike Boyle […]

  3. Some Things I’ve Learnt While Dieting. « Killsession Musings Says:
    February 8, 2012 at 9:46 pm

    […] like Michael Boyle can play around with the training paradigms (see his views on HIIT, low-carb, unilateral training etc) precisely because he has used the existing paradigms so well, for so long, and with […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: